AdvocacyConcealed CarryHeroLawsNewsOpinionSecond Amendment

Why Many Sheriffs Oppose Gun Control




From Press-Enter­prise Some of South­ern California’s most vocal gun rights advo­cates wear badges.

River­side Coun­ty Sher­iff Stan Sniff and San Bernardi­no Coun­ty Sher­iff John McMa­hon have con­sis­tent­ly opposed new gun con­trol leg­is­la­tion. So does Orange Coun­ty Sher­iff San­dra Hutchens.

In a tele­phone inter­view, McMa­hon said more gun con­trol rules are not the best way to pre­vent­ing gun vio­lence.

I gen­er­al­ly oppose any leg­is­la­tion that puts any more restric­tions or con­trol on cit­i­zens hav­ing an abil­i­ty to pos­sess firearms,” said McMa­hon, who has been sher­iff since 2012. “We still have peo­ple run­ning around with guns that aren’t sup­posed to have them.”

In emailed respons­es to ques­tions, Sniff wrote that while the courts “have long held that rea­son­able restric­tions to the Sec­ond Amend­ment are both con­sti­tu­tion­al and also pro­tect our com­mu­ni­ties … Many pro­posed firearms con­trol bills are very poor­ly thought out, hasti­ly draft­ed with­out appro­pri­ate expert input, and incor­rect­ly prof­fered to the pub­lic as ‘mak­ing things safer’ in our com­mu­ni­ties.

In some cas­es, these pro­posed bills actu­al­ly make our com­mu­ni­ties less safe, and remove inher­ent rights of our cit­i­zens to self-defense, or worse, allow only the wealthy, elite or the well-off to pro­tect them­selves,” wrote Sniff, who became sher­iff in 2007.

Three years ago, Sniff, a Repub­li­can like McMa­hon, sent a let­ter to U.S. Sen. Dianne Fein­stein, D-Calif., crit­i­ciz­ing her pro­posed assault-weapons ban.

In many ways your bill unrea­son­ably impinges on the Sec­ond Amend­ment, and it focus­es large­ly on pure­ly ‘cos­met­ic’ fea­tures of legit­i­mate sport­ing, hunt­ing, and recre­ation­al firearms already in wide­spread use in our nation,” he wrote.

The cos­met­ic issues alone cause far too much mean­ing­less com­plex­i­ty for law enforce­ment offi­cers, and worse, could cause com­mon cit­i­zens to unin­ten­tion­al­ly com­mit crimes that have seri­ous poten­tial sanc­tions.”

Cal­i­for­nia Lt. Gov. Gavin New­som, who is behind a bal­lot mea­sure that would impose new rules on guns and ammu­ni­tion, said that while he has enor­mous respect for the sher­iffs and what they do, “This has been the argu­ment for decades. I don’t know that they rep­re­sent a dif­fer­ent point of view than their pre­de­ces­sors, oppos­ing law after law after law.”

Since the mid-1990s, when new gun laws were enact­ed, the gun mur­der rate in Cal­i­for­nia has fall­en 56 per­cent, more than dou­ble the rate of a nation­al decrease in gun mur­ders, New­som said.

I think these things save lives,” he added. “They can dis­agree … but the data does not sup­port their point of view.”

Calls for gun con­trol have esca­lat­ed in recent years fol­low­ing a spate of mass shoot­ings, includ­ing the Dec. 2 ter­ror attack in San Bernardi­no in which a rad­i­cal­ized Islam­ic cou­ple used assault-style weapons to kill 14 and wound 22. Con­gres­sion­al Democ­rats in June staged a sit-in on the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives floor in an unsuc­cess­ful effort to force a gun con­trol vote.

Cal­i­for­nia vot­ers in Novem­ber will con­sid­er Newsom’s bal­lot mea­sure. Among oth­er things, it would ban ammu­ni­tion mag­a­zines that hold more than 10 rounds and set up a process for tak­ing firearms from those who are legal­ly barred from own­ing a gun.

Polling shows 89 per­cent of peo­ple sup­port­ing a process for those barred from gun own­er­ship to relin­quish their weapons, New­som said.

This sum­mer, Gov. Jer­ry Brown signed six gun con­trol bills, includ­ing mea­sures that require back­ground checks for bul­let pur­chas­es and ban semi­au­to­mat­ic rifles with mag­a­zines that can be eject­ed with a small tool. Crit­ics said the “bul­let but­ton” was an end-around to the state’s ban on detach­able mag­a­zines.

CONCEALED CARRY

Coun­ty sher­iffs are elect­ed offi­cials in Cal­i­for­nia with the author­i­ty to issue per­mits for civil­ians to car­ry con­cealed firearms in pub­lic. Sniff said that while he sup­ports and encour­ages law-abid­ing res­i­dents to obtain con­cealed car­ry per­mits, “rad­i­cal gun groups” believe he’s not issu­ing enough.

The pub­lic still expects the sher­iff to issue CCWs using good sense as well as rea­son­able­ness in mak­ing deter­mi­na­tions of who is licensed and allowed by the depart­ment to car­ry loaded, hid­den hand­guns into our pub­lic places,” said Sniff, who is a mem­ber of the Nation­al Rifle Asso­ci­a­tion, the Cal­i­for­nia Rifle & Pis­tol Asso­ci­a­tion and Gun Own­ers of Cal­i­for­nia.

As elect­ed offi­cials, sher­iffs can accept cam­paign con­tri­bu­tions. A check of dona­tions to Sniff, McMa­hon, Hutchens and Los Ange­les Coun­ty Sher­iff Jim McDon­nell in recent years found no instances of con­tri­bu­tions by the NRA or oth­er gun rights or gun con­trol groups.




Previous post

BASE 12 IS OPEN

Arizona Republican candidate for Attorney General Mark Brnovich talks to supporters at the Republican election night party Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2014, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)
Next post

AZ AG: Guns Are Allowed At Private Schools

ER1C ☠

ER1C ☠

Dedicated Second Amendment Advocate, At-Home Gunsmith, Designer, Blogger, Video Guy, Author, Business Owner & ReloadOne Member.

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.