FeaturedGun RightsNewsOpinionPoliticsVideos

5 Reasons The Daily Wire Know She’s Lying About Taking Guns

From The Dai­ly Wire:

Hillary Clinton’s accep­tance speech as the Demo­c­ra­t­ic pres­i­den­tial nom­i­nee fea­tured numer­ous lies amidst her bor­ing lack of charis­ma, but one of her biggest lies was that she wasn’t going to take away anyone’s guns.

I’m not here to repeal the 2nd Amend­ment. I’m not here to take away your guns. I just don’t want you to be shot by some­one who shouldn’t have a gun in the first place,” Clin­ton said. “We should be work­ing with respon­si­ble gun own­ers to pass com­mon-sense reforms and keep guns out of the hands of crim­i­nals, ter­ror­ists and all oth­ers who would do us harm.”

Here are five rea­sons why we know she’s lying about this.

1. Hillary has said she would con­sid­er imple­ment­ing Australia’s gun ban. Back in Octo­ber, Clin­ton was asked at a cam­paign event in New Hamp­shire if the U.S. could put forth an Aus­tralia-style gun ban.

I think it would be worth con­sid­er­ing doing it on the nation­al lev­el, if that could be arranged,” Clin­ton replied.

As Katie Pavlich wrote in The Hill at the time, Clin­ton was essen­tial­ly con­sid­er­ing “a man­dat­ed nation­al buy­back pro­gram” and “get­ting rid of hand­guns in the Unit­ed States.”

It’s also worth not­ing that Australia’s gun ban had no effect on reduc­ing gun homi­cides.

2. Hillary will like­ly appoint a Supreme Court jus­tice to over­turn D.C. v. Heller, where the Court rec­og­nized the right to bear arms enshrined in the Sec­ond Amend­ment. In an inter­view with ABC’s George Stephanopou­los, Clin­ton said:

I think that for most of our his­to­ry, there was a nuanced read­ing of the Sec­ond Amend­ment until the deci­sion by the late Jus­tice Scalia and there was no argu­ment until then that local­i­ties and states and the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment had a right, as we do with every amend­ment, to impose rea­son­able reg­u­la­tion.

But as Nation­al Review’s Daniel Payne point­ed out, Jus­tice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the major­i­ty opin­ion, actu­al­ly did say that reg­u­la­tions that set “con­di­tions and qual­i­fi­ca­tions on the com­mer­cial sale of arms” were per­mis­si­ble under the Sec­ond Amend­ment, which Scalia wrote was not absolute. It’s pos­si­ble Clin­ton doesn’t know this, but not like­ly.

Because she is not stu­pid, Hillary Clin­ton under­stands that there is no mean­ing­ful dis­tinc­tion between Heller and the Sec­ond Amend­ment itself; to get rid of one is, effec­tive­ly, to get rid of the oth­er,” writes Payne. “It is sil­ly, insult­ing, and alarm­ing that she still insists upon pre­tend­ing oth­er­wise.”

Addi­tion­al­ly, Crime Research Pre­ven­tion Cen­ter pres­i­dent John Lott has not­ed that Clin­ton is essen­tial­ly say­ing that the D.C. hand­gun ban that was struck down in Heller was “rea­son­able,” and that Jus­tices Ruth Bad­er Gins­burg and Stephen Brey­er, both of whom were appoint­ed by her hus­band, vot­ed against Heller. Jus­tice Ele­na Kagan actu­al­ly “served in the Clin­ton admin­is­tra­tion and helped lead the President’s gun con­trol ini­tia­tives,” accord­ing to Lott.

If Hillary wins in Novem­ber, she will appoint Scalia’s suc­ces­sor and the Supreme Court will over­turn the Heller deci­sion,” writes Lott. “Make no mis­take about it, gun bans will return.”

Read The Full Sto­ry: http://www.dailywire.com/news/7928/watch-hillary-im-not-here-take-away-your-guns-here-aaron-bandler

Previous post

My Alternative #HILLARYJAWS InfoWars.com Entry

Next post

Review: Strike Industries "Strike Switch"

ER1C ☠

ER1C ☠

Dedicated Second Amendment Advocate, At-Home Gunsmith, Designer, Blogger, Video Guy, Author, Business Owner & ReloadOne Member.

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.